Of Mad Mice and Madmen

The University of North Carolina just got a big load of chump change to the tune of 8.6 million $ to study the relationship genetics plays in the development of psychiatric disorders according to a recent post to Star News Online’s Health Pulse blog.

The National Institutes of Health today announced the grants, which also will go to other research schools like the Medical College of Wisconsin and Johns Hopkins University.

UNC’s funding will create a new Centers of Excellence in Genomic Science at the school. The money will come in over five years, and the National Institute of Mental Health – part of NIH – will fund the first two years of UNC’s project, which will receive about $6 million of the total through federal stimulus money.

The article goes on to say:

The research will combine genetics and neurobehavior using unique strains of lab mice to find genetic and environmental factors in psychiatric conditions.

From mice to men and women, now that is a big leap.

Didn’t I just post a blog entry on research showing that many people labeled bipolar disorder sufferers manage to recover from this disorder before they reach the age of 30? The kind of research that shows that people recover from serious mental illnesses flies in the face of this other kind of research being conducted today. Many universities, research teams, and funding foundations continue to pursue that mad cluster of genes ignoring the above evidence completely. If recovery is possible, then genetic make up can only be so important in the development of mental disorders.

The psychiatric profession, in a desperate bid to validate itself as a legitimate science, has spent much time and energy promoting this kind of wild gene chase. The presumption is that the primary factor involved in the development of serious mental illness is biological, or genetic. Well, the problem here is that there is no science whatsoever in making that presumption. Simply put, environmental and social factors in the development of mental illness have not been found to be any less instrumental than biological factors in the formation of such diseases.

Alright, that said, isn’t spending money on this matter a little like “putting the cart before the horse” as the popular expression goes? Your chances of getting anywhere except back to square one are not that great when you are starting with a presumption. (Science would presume nothing after all.) The idea is not to rule out environment nor society until the evidence is in.

As I have pointed out previously, the rate of mental illness in the USA has been climbing dramatically since the beginning of the twentieth century. The labeled mentally ill have not been found to be particularly more adept in reproducing than any other social group in our society. This fact alone would tend to rule out genetics as the determining factor in the development of serious mental illness. I’m not saying we should ignore the human genome, but maybe we should spend a little more money on exploring the social and environmental dimensions involved in the development of mental illness, too.

8.6 million $ is a lotta money to throw away on the care and maintenance of a Jabberwocky.

Advertisements

One Response

  1. Yesterday, I came to watch – more or less accidentally, yes, since I’d heard it were a somewhat doubtful pleasure (which it is), and wasn’t sure whether I wanted to do that to myself – A Brilliant Madness. Can’t remember the name of the shrink who states that, miraculously, a number of “schizophrenics” do recover, while no one has a clue how and why. The film makers also ask John Nash himself what he did to recover, and he says, he eventually decided to think rationally. So, will power. Basically.

    I don’t always know whether to cry or laugh, when I hear about another huge heap of bucks being poured down the drain in the eugenicists’ indefatigable quest for defective genes. While the – true – answers are right there, staring everybody in the face. All one would have to do to see them is open their eyes, and ears, listening to those, who actually have recovered. Also concerning the causes. John Nash is “allowed” (because he’s John Nash, I suppose) to say something along the lines of: “I think, it can be an escape.” The rest of the film of course refers to the bio-model as if it were a proven fact.

    I wonder how many recovered people one could interview about what helped them recover, what they think – maybe even know – had caused their madness, etc. for those 8.6 million bucks. A whole bunch, I suppose… But hey, what would then become of eugenics??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: