Antipsychotic Drug Is A Misnomer

I have been using the language of the oppressor too often for convenience and communications sake, and now I have to publish a retraction of sorts.

I’m not going to refer to neuroleptic drugs as medicine because there is nothing medicinal about these drugs. Not only are these drugs not medicine, but antipsychotic is not an adjective that describes these pills at all. Not only do these drugs not cure schizophrenia, but these drugs have been credited with impeding the actual process of recovery from any psychosis that a person may have developed.

Neuroleptic is the older term. Neuroleptic comes from the Greek, and means ‘take control of’ and specifically ‘the nervous system’. These drugs then take control away from the person who takes them. When it comes to the newer atypical neuroleptic drugs, this lapse in personal self-control translates into those metabolic changes—resulting in obesity, heart disease, etc.—that have contributed to the average age at death for mental health consumers being 25 years younger than that for the rest of the population.

Let’s look at what these drugs do. Neuroleptic drugs block receptors of the neurotransmitter dopamine. Doing so, these drugs impair the functions of the brain. The functions of the brain that these drugs impair are:

1. Motor function—the drugs make people uncoordinated, and the drugs make their bodies shake.
2. Emotional function—the drugs mute or blunt the emotions, numb the patient, and bring about what is described as a lack of affect.
3. Cognitive function—the drugs make people stupid, disrupting the higher thought processes that separate humankind from beasts.

Although the doctors say they are trying to target the emotions with these drugs, the drugs themselves are not so discriminate.

Much research has accumulated over the past few years to indicate that these drugs change brain structure. Long term use of neuroleptic drugs has been found to shrink the frontal lobes, that area of the brain that makes us human, and to enlarge the basal ganglia, an area of the brain thought to have much to do with psychosis. Animal studies reveal that much of the damage found in autopsies and MRI scans, and often attributed to mental illness, is in all probability a result of these drugs being given to treat the disease.

Mental health consumers and the general public are being deceived when they are not told about these matters. No consent is informed consent if it is consent given without perusal of all the facts. People as a rule are not informed when it comes to the damage done by these neuroleptic drugs. You are not likely to find the truth about these drugs in pharmaceutical company advertising literature, but you can get some idea that things are a little off kilter just by reading the fine print on the so called side effects. The list of things that can wrong with these drugs, even the companies selling them admit, goes on and on.

Studies have found these drugs to be effective as anti-schizophrenic drugs only in the short term. Long term use of these drugs is always detrimental. These drugs have addictive qualities, and to quit cold turkey could lead to serious withdrawal symptoms, including rebound psychosis. The longer an individual has been maintained on neuroleptic drugs, the less promising that individual’s chances become to ever make a complete recovery. Given the facts, there is very little about neuroleptic drugs that can be said to be at all antipsychotic.

4 Responses

  1. The problem with not using the oppressor’s language is that most people do use it, also when googling. Most people use “antipsychotics” as a search term, not “neuroleptics”. Just as they use “schizophrenia”, “psychosis”, “mania”, not “existential crisis”, “altered/extreme state of consciousness”, or something along those lines. A lot of people also still don’t know what to make of “existential/spiritual/psychological/whatever crisis” for instance; isn’t that when you lose your job, or get a divorce, something? Can’t be the same as “mental illness”, can it?? Why I alternately use the oppressor’s terminology in quotation marks and the proper one. Makes it easier to find me on the net, and get what I mean.

    • Neuroleptic drugs may produce a state of apathy, lack of initiative and limited range of emotion. In psychotic patients, neuroleptic drugs cause a reduction in confusion and agitation and tend to normalize psychomotor activity.
      ~from the definition of Neuroleptic

      Note the above and very odd part of a definition with apathy, lack of initiative, and limited emotional range translating into confusion and agitation reduction, and psychomotor activity normalization. Seriously, do they really expect us to believe that these drugs have different effects on people depending on whether those people are psychotic or not? Give a person these drugs, and given apathy, lack of initiative, and a limited range of emotions, somebody is going to be calling that person mentally ill.

      • “Give a person these drugs, and given apathy, lack of initiative, and a limited range of emotions, somebody is going to be calling that person mentally ill.”

        Sounds somehow backwards, doesn’t it? Just like the fact that, in case of doubt, being on neuroleptics is the crucial “symptom” of “psychosis”, as this study has established.

  2. […] how many people this may be happening to, before we even get to drug effects. As observed in a comment on a post I ran across last night at Lunatic Fringe: Note the above and very odd part of a […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: