Misdiagnosis: Bipolar Disorder Or Drug Toxicity?

Our bipolar disorder boom is far from over. This is illustrated by an article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal , Bipolar disorder often misdiagnosed, that would misconstrue matters even farther.

[Betty] Smith is one of the 2.5 million Americans affected by bipolar disorder every year, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. The mental illness, marked by extreme changes in mood and behavior, is typically diagnosed before the age of 20, with more than two-thirds of patients having at least one close relative with the illness or with unipolar major depression. The disorder is found in all races, ethnic groups and social classes.

Gender bias in diagnosing? I have no doubt that this could be alleviated by putting more doctors on the couch.

While both men and women are just as likely to develop the disorder, statistics and studies show there are gender biases in diagnosing it. According to a 2000 report from the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, women are far more likely to be misdiagnosed with depression and men are far more likely to be misdiagnosed with schizophrenia.

These men and women so “misdiagnosed” are later misdiagnosed with the bipolar disorder label.

Realizing the distinction is important because, [internist Stacey] Weiland says, medication for bipolar and depression vary greatly. In addition, treating a person who has bipolar with a common anti-depressant medication like an SSRI, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, can actually bring about a major manic episode.

The presumption here is that if the drug triggered this manic episode, the person must have been a person with bipolar disorder in the first place. This is presumption on the part of the doctors making it. A certain number of the people first labeled depressive, and given anti-depressants, have manic reactions to those drugs. This percentage represents an increase in the overall number of people labeled bipolar. This increase came about through the use of anti-depressants and it didn’t come about through any contagiousness of the “disease”. How, after all, can a disorder be contagious that is thought to be hereditary in origin?

Before 1995, children were rarely diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Between 1994 and 2003, there was a 40-fold increase in the number of children being diagnosed with bipolar disorder — from 20,000 to 800,000.

Emphasis added.

Many professionals are saying that what was diagnosed as bipolar disorder in children was actually chronic irritability, and they are considering giving this chronic irritability an altogether new label, Temper Dysregulation Disorder with Dysporia, in the next issue of the DSM. All indications are that this TDD will make the revision slated for publication in 2013. What this addition disregards is the fact that this juvenile bipolar boom began when children labeled ADHD were relabeled with an early onset bipolar disorder label. What started as 2 “mental illness” labels has, given tremendous help by the APA, mutated into 3 “mental illness” labels.

It looks like childhood bipolar disorder is here to stay, joined to the relatively new “mental illness” cash cow ADHD, and soon to be supplemented with the additional “mental illness” label Temper Dysregulation Disorder with Dysporia. Considering these factors, I think it would be safe to say that once rare childhood “mental disorder” has a very great future indeed. Perhaps you would see this circumstance as an improvement; I myself think this is going to prove detrimental to our children’s overall health.

The real problem here is actually not “mental illness” at all, it’s drug toxicity. When you’ve got a large number of people chemically unbalanced by prescription pharmaceuticals, the way to health is by getting people off drugs. Many of our nation’s mental health professionals have unfortunately not made this connection, and so people get caught in the revolving treatment door, and our country’s growing mental health crisis continues to escalate.

Advertisements

7 Responses

  1. I could write a book about drug toxicity, based on personal experience.

  2. As there is no one to disagree with the priest-psychiatrists of what the correct answer to the problem of mental illness is, the drug solution will continue.

    Maybe it will work out alright, there are many successful alcoholics ( using the drug alcohol to deal with lifes problems), why not successful pill takers?

    • Many people have been chemically disabled by psychiatric drugs. When it is perceived in terms of functionality, dysfunction could be said to be a failure to function. Successful dysfunction is an oxymoron, or a contradiction in terms. It’s like saying a person is a successful failure.

      The point is there are, and there have been, different ways of dealing with people in distress than those provided by biological medical model psychiatry (i.e. pills). The influence and power of medical model psychiatry is pretty pervasive now, but I don’t imagine that influence and power will last. I may be naive, but I have a little faith in people’s reasoning capacity, and I think perhaps that reasoning capacity will prove triumphant eventually.

      It’s hard to chemically enhance an organism that represents the pinnacle of millions of years of evolution. Nature is more likely to be maimed in the attempt to do so than enhanced. These pills arose hardly a millasecond ago in evolutionary history. If we look, any “enhancement” is going to seem transitory, while the damage that comes with it is likely to prove more lasting.

      • Yes I was joking about the successful drug (continual use) use to cope with lifes troubles. as a real solution.

        As you cite the “millions of years of evolution” for our human brain to become intelligent, our intelligence is what we cant cope with (in “mental illness”), living alienated in a concrete noisy city (away from nature and a small local social group where are ancestors originated).

        “functionality”, is what the psychiatrists are working for, and how they can justify ECT/EST as a valid treatment. I think it can be murder without a corpse.

        The metaphorical broken leg , is always a broken leg, in psychiatry, does not make sense.
        People are either healing or getting worse from an injury with the passage of time.

        Psychiatric Drugs to disable the brains higher functions, higher reasoning ability, what we need to control our selfs with, through rational logical thought, does seem stupid.
        But the psychiatrist and the drug Co. will continue to make money, milking the patient for money or power for the duration of the “patients” life.
        Patient always a patient, dont stop taking the medication, you might get worse, but you might get better.

  3. I think that in the DSM, medication-induced mania must be ruled out first before a diagnosis of bipolar can be made. Ironic in this sense that we’re now seeing the assumption that only those with bipolar will develop SSRI-induced mania.

    • I think that medication-induced mania has to be ruled in before people can consider the benefits of detoxification. Right now, when mania is triggered by an SSRI antidepressant, the general assumption is a “misdiagnosis” of bipolar disorder.

      Major depressive disorder used to considered a treatable condition that generally dissipated over time. This has ceased to be the case after the introduction of SSRI antidepressants. This is a reason for looking at other means to deal with depression such as through exercise and physical activity. There have been studies, in fact, in which exercise alone was shown to out perform both SSRI antidepressants alone and antidepressants with exercise. When SSRI antidepressants hardly perform any better than an enhanced placebo there has to be much question as to their overall utility. The placebo effect (mind over matter, more or less) may be a good excuse for drug companies and the psychiatrists in their pay to push these products, but for people with a little common sense, a placebo is a placebo, and if it beats your drug, your drug is a dud.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: