Three Harvard Psychiatrists Reprimanded

I have a bit of good news to relay. Dr. Joseph Biederman, a man who was largely responsible for the recent bipolar baby boom we have yet to marginally recover from, and two of his Harvard cronies, has been sanctioned for having violated conflict of interests rules. This action was covered by the Boston Globe in a story, Harvard doctors punished over pay.

Concluding a three-year investigation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School sanctioned renowned child psychiatrist Dr. Joseph Biederman and two colleagues after finding they violated conflict of interest rules.

The other two violators in this matter are Dr. Thomas Spencer and Dr. Timothy Wilens. The doctors have responded to the sanctions by sending out a letter of apolegy. This letter offers some details into their punishment.

They said the institutions imposed remedial actions, requiring them to refrain from all paid industry-sponsored outside activities for one year, with an additional two-year monitoring period during which they must obtain approval before engaging in paid activities. They were also required to undergo unspecified additional training and suffer “a delay of consideration for promotion or advancement.’’

The bad news is that this punishment may not amount to all that much.

“It’s hard for me to make that judgment, but this all sounds like a little slap on the wrist,’’ said Dr. Jerome Kassirer, a Tufts University School of Medicine professor and outspoken critic of close ties between the drug industry and physicians. He pointed out that Biederman is a full professor at Harvard Medical School, so it’s unclear how a delay in promotion or advancement would affect him. Also, Biederman severed his industry ties soon after Mass. General and Harvard began their separate but coordinated investigations.

Adding to the good news, on the other hand, this decision also sends a clear message to professors of psychiatry that it is not alright to lie to institutions of higher learning about the extent of their financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. It is hoped that this decision will help doctors put human health considerations back, in a hierarchy of values, above drug company kick backs, investments, and favors, where they belong.

5 Responses

  1. Happy happy joy joy! Just posted on FB. Something nice to celebrate on the long holiday weekend. Thank you!

  2. Good news.
    Thanks for posting.


  3. Their punishment is so minor. Why on earth are they not losing their jobs?

    • Any acknowledgement of wrong doing, and a half-hearted correction, is better than no change at all. The power of drug manufacturers, biological psychiatry, and wrong headed people is such that I’m willing to recognize any small gain as a gain.

      The public has been given this wonder drug impression of psychiatric drugs that is far from the truth. This public needs to be educated about that truth with the facts. When reports of the damage done to people is shoved into the faces of people doing that damage, I will think we are beginning to make progress.

      There is a different sort of psychiatrist in the world, and I hope we will be seeing more of this different sort of psychiatrist in the future.

    • They should lose these academic standings and jobs. And I think they taint the profession. I can’t understand colleagues, academia not demanding it. It’s just utterly disgraceful conduct.

Leave a Reply to duanesherry Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: