Addictions, behavioral and chemical, declared brain diseases

No gain without a pain killer!

The American Society of Addiction Medicine has opened a Pandora’s box that will surely come back to haunt them. The LA Times reports, Addiction is a brain disease, experts declare. The problem here is that we’re not just talking alcoholism, speed and heroin, we’re also talking gambling, sex, and the internet.

Addiction is “not simply a behavioral problem involving too much alcohol, drugs, gambling or sex,” the American Society of Addiction Medicine declared this week. Instead, the society notes, “Addiction is a primary, chronic disease of brain reward, motivation, memory and related circuitry.”

I don’t get the idea that anybody laying down solid evidence to support this thesis. I’d like to be shown an extracted brain circuit, for instance.

In other words, addiction is not just about the act of raising a bottle to the lips, drawing deeply on a cigarette or bingeing guiltily in chocolate bars in private. There just might be something amiss in your head that compels you to behave that way.

There you go…chocolate addiction! From what I’ve heard the DSM-V is set to include gambling as an addiction with sex and the internet in the appendix, sort of knocking at the gate if you will. I can’t help but think that ASAM is envisioning a greatly expanded DSM-VI already.

Sex addiction (hypersexuality) is an example of one of these so called behavioral addictions that readily lends itself to parody. What’s the difference between a sex addict and a mere enthusiast? Usually it’s a partner that the “addict” is in a supposedly committed relationship with. Alright, you’ve got a person who either ends the relationship, and can revert to enthusiast status, or you’ve got a person who is so addicted to this partner as to make such a reversion more difficult than usual. The partner is usually not such an enthusiast, and in fact, is usually if married on the way to divorce court, and if not married is in the process of transitioning to another partner. Unless, of course, he or she has been gulled into buying the sex addiction argument.

This is a first for ASAM, previous definitions have restricted the ground covered to substance abuse. Now every fad and fancy in the book is open to reassessment as a behavioral addiction, and a behavioral addiction equaling “brain disease”. Why? Because, of course, ASAM says so.

But just because something’s widely accepted professionally doesn’t mean it’s widely accepted out there in the world. At the website of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, you’ll see colorful PET scan images that attempt to drum home the point: One is of a normal brain and one of a cocaine abuser: metabolically, they look quite different. Right next to that pairing is another set of images, of two hearts – one healthy, one diseased. Again, the images look quite different. There would be no controversy over declaring one of the hearts physically diseased. That can’t be said for addiction, even in the face of all the evidence.

Right, now how different is the brain of an addicted internet user from a complete computer naif?

The health food obsession, as I made note of in an earlier post, has for some time, and in some quarters, been categorized under the mental disorder tag Orthorexia. This is amusing as junk food addiction has not yet entered the medical lexicon. Of course, there’s another disorder associated with pigging out on a fast food regimen, and that’s a growing problem in this country, obesity. Next thought, if only there were more exercise junkies around, and exercise junkies who could keep off the steroids.

4 Responses

  1. Nice job! Not a fan of this line of pseudo-science myself. It really is a way for people to abdicate responsibility and accountability for their own actions.
    Don’t blame me I have a disease…bullshit. I know of three people who went through “Drug Court” to avoid the legal penalties for felony crimes committed—the worst example of the three continued to commit felony crimes—and justify them in spite of the “moral reconation” therapy she had. It seems to me that choices that people do not want to own, are the ones that are due to their “diseased brain” and ones that they do own and want recognition for are due to “working a recovery program”!? WTF ever…It is more than a little suspicious to me…

    • Phoney fact #8 from NARSAD’s (formerly the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, presently the Brain and Behavioral Research Foundation) Top Ten Mental Health Myths.

      Myth #8: If you have a mental illness, you can will it away. Being treated for a psychiatric disorder means an individual has in some way “failed” or is weak.
      Fact: A serious mental illness cannot be willed away. Ignoring the problem does not make it go away, either. It takes courage to seek professional help.

      Life crises have nothing whatsoever to do with willpower and self-control. This bogus myth excuses people in mental health treatment from very adult concerns regarding freedom and responsibility…Not!

      Is irresponsibility a choice or an “illness”? I maintain that to one degree or another it is a choice. If a person can choose to be irresponsible, then a person can, with equal facility, choose to be responsible.

      I don’t think these doctors have sufficiently demonstrated that there is not an element of will (or strength and stamina) involved in the overcoming of, or the recovering from, what they refer to as “mental illness”. Ditto, the subject at hand, substance abuse and obsessive behaviors.

      Psychiatric labels are not a good reason to theorize that certain members of the human race have devolved into a lower species, and should be treated accordingly.

  2. It is the balance between passion and reason.
    If you are ALL reason, all logic, there is no passion or feeling. You are then a robot and no longer human.

    If you are ALL passion or feeling, there is no “reason” and just a mindless animal that can not foresee or plan for the future.

    • Thanks, Mark, Let me add that the bridge to this passion and reason schism is not to be found in a pill bottle. Solving problems is the way to deal with problems, even if they happen to be of a personal nature. Avoiding problems, with the help of a drug or drugs, is a way of not finding a solution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: